• Home
  • original
  • 1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights

1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights

1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights
1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights

1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights
A VINTAGE ORIGINAL FROM 1920 MEASURING 6 1/2 X 8 1/2 INCHES OF “SQUAW” DELEGATES TO THE SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION. FITE, DESCENDENT OF SEQUOYAH, INVENTOR OF THE cHEROKEE ALPHABET, WILL BE ONE OF TWO INDIAN WOMAN TO REPRESENT OKLAHOMA AT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION IN SAN FRANCISCO. One month after the 19th Amendment went into effect in 1920, Oklahoma sent eight women to the Democratic National Convention. One of those women was Mrs. Fite – her own first name of Nannie Kathryn doesn’t appear in news reports until an Oklahoman article in 1960. A woman cannot be modest, charming and beautiful – and cast a vote. Such a demand will mean war between the sexes. Men will be shoved to the wall for fear of being trampled, homes will be deserted, and nurseries emptied, so said the prophets to The Associated Press, as reported in The Oklahoman immediately after the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote on June 4, 1919. What a difference a year makes. In 1920, The Oklahoman called it an “honor” for our state to be the first to send women to the Democratic National Convention. It took 30 years of Oklahoma women demanding the vote from the all-male Legislature. Nationally, the issue went before 22 Congresses, failing each time. Some 26 special sessions were called on the issue. Women were jailed, ridiculed and threatened. The men didn’t give the vote to women. The women took it, an Oklahoman article said in 1930. In 1890, when Oklahoma was still Indian Territory, an equal rights bill was presented to the territorial Legislature. It was promptly killed. OSSAA: Board approves ADM for 2020-21 school year. SPORTSUpdated: 4 hours ago. Some Oklahomans believed that by letting women vote, somehow politics would become purified, wholesome. Several Oklahoma women thrived in their leadership roles. One was Aloysius Larch-Miller, called the “martyr” of the movement. Larch-Miller edited opinions handed down by the Supreme Court at the state reporter’s office. It was there an informal headquarters of the suffragettes emerged. A natural organizer and powerful speaker, Larch-Miller was challenged by Gov. Robertson in 1918 when he agreed to call a special legislative session if she could persuade the legislators to appear for free. She succeeded, although the governor delayed the session. By a scant majority, Oklahoma voters granted women the right to vote in November 1918 – one of several states to do so prior to ratification of the U. However, a clause in the state law said women could not hold state constitutional offices. That took years to change. State Dem chair’thrilled’ for Kamala; Horn calls pick’historic. NEWSUpdated: 13 hours ago. Interestingly enough, the first Oklahoma woman sent to Congress in 1920, Miss Alice Robertson, was opposed to the suffrage movement. In 1921, Oklahoma elected to the state Senate the widowed mother of six children who literally used her own hands to build a home, then earned a law degree. In the Legislature, Mrs. Lamar Looney introduced bills benefiting child labor, maternity and infancy issues, confederate pensions, farmers and more. A fellow senator commented she was the only senator to preside without holding a gavel in one hand and a cigar in the other. Also in 1920, Oklahoma voters elected Bessie McColgin, a Republican, to the state House of Representatives. “We were just bent on learning, and not being passive observers, ” recalled Alice Everett, 90, of Oklahoma City, who was a teen-ager among the suffragettes. That was a totally different world. Fite, for the past quarter of a century engaged in the practice of medicine at Tahlequah, came there from Bartow county, Georgia, in 1883, a young physician just out of college looking for a good location for beginning practice. He was born in Gordon County, Georgia, October 17, 1856, and spent his boyhood among farm scenes and associated with an atmosphere of refinement and culture. His parents were both possessed of unusually good educations. He is descended from pure German stock, and his ancestors came to America just in time to identify themselves with the cause of independence in the colonies and join the ranks of the Continental army. The name was originally Viet, and shortly before the Revolutionary war, three brothers, peter, Conrad and Leonard Viet, came to America; Peter settled near Salisbury, North Carolina, Leonard in Philadelphia and Conrad in Baltimore, Maryland. It was at the home of the last named that the first session of the Continental Congress seems to have been held. During the years following their settlement in America the name was somehow Americanized “Fite, ” probably changed by the brothers themselves, as all three branches of the family use the same spelling. Peter Fite took part in the Revolution and became a rich slave-holding planter; he died near the place of his first settlement about 1835, at the age of eighty-seven years. His children were: Jacob; Peter, Elias; Henry; Christina, wife of Lieutenant Pierce, of Tennessee; Rachel, married John Simpson; and Mary, who married John Murray, and died in southern Illinois. Richard’s grandfather, Peter Fite, was born in 1790, and passed away in 1887; his wife, Nancy Carlock, was born in 1798 and died two years after her husband. They were also planters and wealthy slave owners, and influential citizens in their county. Fite was born in Tennessee in 1825 and was reared in that state, where he received his education. He received his medical education at the School of Medicine at Nashville, Tennessee; he located in Georgia for the practice of his profession, and was identified with the interests of that state until compelled by age to retire from his life of active usefulness. At the breaking out of the Civil war he was appointed a surgeon in the army of E. Kirby Smith, and took part in the battle of Perryville, in General Bragg’s army. Following this he was transferred to Pemberton’s army at Vicksburg, and was there paroled when the city fell into the hands of the Federals. Later he rejoined the army and was with General Longstreet’s command at Knoxville until after the siege was raised; he was on the field of battle at Chickamauga. He accompanied the army of Bragg to Chattanooga, where Missionary Ridge was fought, and then General Johnston was placed in command of the army and conducted the retreat to Atlanta; Dr. Fite was with this entire campaign. Hood succeeded Johnston and was defeated in Atlanta and also at Franklin and Nashville, in all of which Dr. Fite took part as a surgeon. Fite married Sarah T. Denman, daughter of Colonel Felix G. Denman, a soldier in the war of 1812, a large land owner and slave holding planter of Georgia. Fite died in 1891, the mother of Judge Augustus W. A member of the supreme court of Georgia for sixteen years; Laura; Dr. Of Muskogee, Oklahoma; Sarah F. Fite was a student in the high school of Sonora, Georgia, and on reaching his majority worked on a farm and taught school. He chose medicine as his profession and attended the Southern Medical College at Atlanta, Georgia, where he graduated with first honors in 1881. He took a post graduate course in the New York Polyclinic in 1891. After his graduation he practiced a year in Georgia, and spent one year in Texas, after which he came to Tahlequah, which has since been the field of his labors. He has built up a satisfactory and lucrative practice in the capital, and is recognized as one of the leading men in his profession. He and his family are all Democrats, and he has taken rather an active part in the Cherokee affairs. He was medical superintendent of the educational institution of the nation, of the insane asylum, and of the national jail for several years. He favored single statehood, and was a delegate to the two statehood conventions. He is, like his father’s family, a Presbyterian, and is a member of the Knights of Pythias. He owns considerable property in and near Tahlequah and has a sumptuous country home adjoining the city limits of the historic old capital. Fite married, in 1884, at Tahlequah, Nannie K. Daughter of Carter Daniels, a prominent Cherokee citizen. Her mother was a niece of Sequoyah, the Cherokee Cadmus. Their children are: Houston Bartow, Augustus Willard, Sarah Katharine, John Stapler, and Denman Wyly. A History of the State of Oklahoma, Volume 2, by Luther B. A successful physician and a prominent citizen of the old capital city of Tahlequah, has been identified with the professional and educational affairs of this section of Oklahoma since 1893. He was primarily an educator and made a reputation for himself in connection with the Cherokee Indian schools. He was born in Crawfordsville, Indiana, June 27, 1867, lived on a farm until he was about seventeen years old and then began his independent career as a country school teacher. He entered Wabash College as a member of the class of 1892 and by the end of his sophomore year his work in his studies and his interest in Presbyterian church affairs recommended him as the proper man to take charge in the field of missionary education, and he was accordingly selected as head of the old and famous Dwight Mission School at Sallisaw, Indian Territory. After two years and a half there he was placed in charge of the Tahlequah Institute. He began his work at the capital in January, 1896 and continued as superintendent until the fall of 1902. He then abandoned school work and entered the medical department of the University of Michigan, where he completed the four year course and was graduated in 1906. Since then he has been in active practice at Tahlequah. He is a member of the Cherokee County Medical Society and the Oklahoma State Medical Association. Peterson was married in Indiana, September 6, 1888, to Miss Hannah N. She was born in Montgomery County, Indiana, December 11, 1867, her father, John Duckworth, being a pioneer of that county. Peterson have the following children: J. Norwood, Kenneth Berry, Dwight A. Peterson’s grandfather was William Peterson, who was born in Pennsylvania of German antecedents, and died at Crawfordsville, Indiana in 1877, aged seventy-seven. His wife was Eliza Wheat, and they had eight children. Isaac Peterson the Doctor’s father was born in Putnam county, Ohio, in 1835 grew up in Montgomery County, Indiana where his parents located in 1840 and was a substantial farmer. He married Mary E. Berry, a daughter of David Berry, a Virginian by birth. She was born in Montgomery county, Indiana, in 1838 and still resides there. Their children were: Ida, wife of S. Paterson, of Fremont, Nebraska; Dr. A dentist of the same city; and his twin sister, Bertha E. Wife of Royal Dice, of Crawfordsville. The 1920 Democratic National Convention was held at the Civic Auditorium in San Francisco, California from June 28 to July 6, 1920. It resulted in the nomination of Governor James M. Cox of Ohio for president and Assistant Secretary of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt from New York for vice president. The 1920 Democratic National Convention marked the first time any party had held its nominating convention in a West Coast city. Neither President Woodrow Wilson, in spite of his failing health, nor former Secretary of State and three-time presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan had entirely given up hope that their party would turn to them, but neither was, in the event, formally nominated. In addition to the eventual nominee, Cox, the other high-scoring candidates as the voting proceeded were: Secretary of the Treasury William McAdoo and Attorney General Mitchell Palmer. On the forty-fourth ballot, Governor James M. Cox of Ohio was nominated for the Presidency. [1] Cora Wilson Stewart of Kentucky, head of the National Education Association’s new illiteracy commission, was chosen to second the nomination for Governor Cox. Stewart was selected to replace Kentucky Representative J. Campbell Cantrill, highlighting the candidate’s support for what would become the 19th Amendment. The platform adopted by the convention supported the League of Nations, albeit with qualifications, and women’s suffrage. Although William Gibbs McAdoo (Wilson’s son-in-law and former Treasury Secretary) was the strongest candidate, Wilson blocked his nomination in hopes a deadlocked convention would demand that he run for a third term, even though he was seriously ill, physically immobile, and in seclusion at the time. The Democrats instead nominated Ohio Governor James M. Cox as their presidential candidate and 38-year-old Assistant Secretary of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt, a fifth cousin of the late president Theodore Roosevelt, for vice-president. Fourteen names were placed in nomination. Early favorites for the nomination had included McAdoo and Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer. Others placed in nomination included New York Governor Al Smith, United Kingdom Ambassador John W. Davis, New Jersey Governor Edward I. Edwards, and Oklahoma Senator Robert Latham Owen. History was made at the convention when Laura Clay, a delegate from Kentucky and co-founder of the Kentucky Equal Rights Association and the Democratic Women’s Club of Kentucky, became the first woman to have her name placed into nomination for President at the convention of a major political party. [4] She was also the first woman to receive a convention delegation’s vote for the presidency. Cox asked the delegates to support former Assistant Navy Secretary Franklin D. Roosevelt, because, as some thought, he had a magic name. FDR was nominated by voice vote and received the nomination by acclamation. [7] After it became clear that Roosevelt was the choice of party leaders, former Ambassador David R. Francis of Missouri, Major General Lawrence Tyson of Tennessee, Governor Sam V. Stewart of Montana, former Governor James H. Hawley of Idaho, former FTC Chairman Joseph Davies of Wisconsin, T. Vaughan of Oregon, and oil tycoon Edward L. Doheny of California all withdrew their candidacies. The Nineteenth Amendment (Amendment XIX) to the United States Constitution prohibits the states and the federal government from denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States on the basis of sex. Initially introduced to Congress in 1878, several attempts to pass a women’s suffrage amendment failed until passing the House of Representatives on May 21, 1919, followed by the Senate on June 4, 1919. It was then submitted to the states for ratification. On August 18, 1920, Tennessee was the last of the necessary 36 ratifying states to secure adoption. The Nineteenth Amendment’s adoption was certified on August 26, 1920: the culmination of a decades-long movement for women’s suffrage at both state and national levels. Prior to 1776, women had the right to vote in several of the colonies in what would become the United States, but by 1807 every state constitution denied even limited suffrage. Organizations supporting women’s rights became more active in the mid-nineteenth century and, in 1848, the Seneca Falls convention adopted the Declaration of Sentiments, which called for equality between the sexes and included a resolution urging women to secure the vote. Pro-suffrage organizations used a variety of tactics including legal arguments that relied on existing amendments. After those arguments were struck down by the U. Supreme Court, suffrage organizations, with activists like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, called for a new constitutional amendment that would guarantee women the right to vote. By the late nineteenth century, new states and territories, particularly in the West, began to grant women the right to vote. In 1878, a suffrage proposal that would eventually become the Nineteenth Amendment was introduced to Congress, but it was rejected in 1887. In the 1890s, suffrage organizations focused on a national amendment while still working at the state and local levels. Lucy Burns and Alice Paul emerged as important leaders whose different strategies helped move the Nineteenth Amendment forward. Entry of the United States into World War I helped to shift public perception of women’s suffrage. The National American Woman Suffrage Association, led by Carrie Chapman Catt, supported the war effort, making the case that women should be rewarded with enfranchisement for their patriotic wartime service. The National Woman’s Party staged marches, demonstrations, and hunger strikes while pointing out the contradictions of fighting abroad for democracy while limiting it at home by denying women the right to vote. The work of both organizations swayed public opinion, prompting President Wilson to announce his support of the suffrage amendment in 1918. It passed in 1919 and was adopted in 1920, withstanding two legal challenges, Leser v. Garnett and Fairchild v. The Nineteenth Amendment enfranchised 26 million American women in time for the 1920 U. Presidential election, but the powerful women’s voting bloc that many politicians feared failed to fully materialize until decades later. Additionally, the Nineteenth Amendment failed to fully enfranchise African American, Asian American, Hispanic American, and Native American women (see § Limitations). Shortly after the amendment’s adoption, Alice Paul and the National Woman’s Party began work on the Equal Rights Amendment, which they believed a necessary additional step to ensure equality. African-American woman suffrage efforts. A new focus on a federal amendment. Woman suffrage and World War I patriotism. Women’s voting behavior. League of Women Voters. The Nineteenth Amendment in the National Archives. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. Main article: Women’s suffrage in the United States. Text of the small ad that attracted a diverse meeting of women and men at the first Women’s Rights Convention, held in Seneca Falls, New York, during July 1848. The United States Constitution, adopted in 1789, left the boundaries of suffrage undefined. The only directly elected body created under the original Constitution was the U. House of Representatives, for which voter qualifications were explicitly delegated to the individual states. [note 1] While women had the right to vote in several of the pre-revolutionary colonies in what would become the United States, after 1776, with the exception of New Jersey, all states adopted constitutions that denied voting rights to women. New Jersey’s constitution initially granted suffrage to property-holding residents, including single and married women, but the state rescinded women’s voting rights in 1807 and did not restore them until New Jersey ratified the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. While scattered movements and organizations dedicated to women’s rights existed previously, the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention in New York is traditionally held as the start of the American women’s rights movement. Attended by nearly 300 women and men, the convention was designed to “discuss the social, civil, and religious rights of women”, and culminated in the adoption of the Declaration of Sentiments. [4] Signed by 68 women and 32 men, the ninth of the document’s twelve resolved clauses reads, Resolved, That it is the duty of the women of this country to secure to themselves their sacred right to the elective franchise. [5] Conveners Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton became key early leaders in the U. Women’s suffrage movement, often referred to at the time as the “woman suffrage movement”. [6][7] Mott’s support of women’s suffrage stemmed from as summer spent with the Seneca Nation, one of the six tribes in the Iroquois Confederacy, where women had significant political power, including the right to choose and remove chiefs and veto acts of war. Activism addressing federal women’s suffrage was minimal during the Civil War. In 1865, at the conclusion of the war, a “Petition for Universal Suffrage”, signed by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, among others, called for a national constitutional amendment to “prohibit the several states from disenfranchising any of their citizens on the ground of sex”. [9] The campaign was the first national petition drive to feature woman suffrage among its demands. [10] While suffrage bills were introduced into many state legislatures during this period, they were generally disregarded and few came to a vote. Elizabeth Cady Stanton (seated) with Susan B. Two rival suffrage organizations formed in 1869: the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA), led by suffrage leaders Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, and the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA), led by Lucy Stone. [12][13] The NWSA’s main effort was lobbying Congress for a women’s suffrage amendment to the U. The AWSA generally focused on a long-term effort of state campaigns to achieve women’s suffrage on a state-by-state basis. During the Reconstruction era, women’s rights leaders advocated for inclusion of universal suffrage as a civil right in the Reconstruction Amendments (the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments). Some unsuccessfully argued that the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibited denying voting rights “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude”, [15] implied suffrage for women. [16] Despite their efforts, these amendments did not enfranchise women. [12][17] Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly discriminated between men and women by only penalizing states which deprived adult male citizens of the vote. The NWSA attempted several unsuccessful court challenges in the mid-1870s. [19] Their legal argument, known as the “New Departure” strategy, contended that the Fourteenth Amendment (granting universal citizenship) and Fifteenth Amendment (granting the vote irrespective of race) together guaranteed voting rights to women. Supreme Court rejected this argument. Illinois[21] the U. Supreme Court ruled that the Supreme Court of Illinois’s refusal to grant Myra Bradwell a license to practice law was not a violation of the U. Constitution and refused to extend federal authority in support of women’s citizenship rights. [note 3] In Minor v. Happersett[23] the U. Supreme Court ruled that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not provide voting rights to U. Citizens; it only guaranteed additional protection of privileges to citizens who already had them. If a state constitution limited suffrage to male citizens of the United States, then women in that state did not have voting rights. Supreme Court decisions between 1873 and 1875 denied voting rights to women in connection with the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, suffrage groups shifted their efforts to advocating for a new constitutional amendment. Continued settlement of the western frontier, along with the establishment of territorial constitutions, allowed the women’s suffrage issue to be raised as the western territories progressed toward statehood. Through the activism of suffrage organizations and independent political parties, women’s suffrage was included in the constitutions of Wyoming Territory (1869) and Utah Territory (1870). [17][24] Women’s suffrage in Utah was revoked in 1887, when Congress passed the Edmunds-Tucker Act in 1887 that also prohibited polygamy; it was not restored in Utah until it achieved statehood in 1896. Elizabeth Cady Stanton before the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections. New York Daily Graphic, January 16, 1878, p. Existing state legislatures in the West, as well as those east of the Mississippi River, began to consider suffrage bills in the 1870s and 1880s. Several held voter referendums, but they were unsuccessful[19] until the suffrage movement was revived in the 1890s. Full women’s suffrage continued in Wyoming after it became a state in 1890. Colorado granted partial voting rights that allowed women to vote in school board elections in 1893 and Idaho granted women suffrage in 1896. All states that were successful in securing full voting rights for women before 1920 were located in the West. A federal amendment intended to grant women the right to vote was introduced in the U. Senate for the first time in 1878 by Aaron A. Sargent, a Senator from California who was a women’s suffrage advocate. [26] Stanton and other women testified before the Senate in support of the amendment. [27] The proposal sat in a committee until it was considered by the full Senate and rejected in a 16-to-34 vote in 1887. [28] An amendment proposed in 1888 in the U. House of Representatives called for limited suffrage for women who were spinsters or widows who owned property. By the 1890s, suffrage leaders began to recognize the need to broaden their base of support to achieve success in passing suffrage legislation at the national, state, and local levels. While western women, state suffrage organizations, and the AWSA concentrated on securing women’s voting rights for specific states, efforts at the national level persisted through a strategy of congressional testimony, petitioning, and lobbying. [30][31] After the AWSA and NWSA merged in 1890 to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), the group directed its efforts to win state-level support for suffrage. [32] Suffragists had to campaign publicly for the vote in order to convince male voters, state legislators, and members of Congress that American women wanted to be enfranchised and that women voters would benefit American society. Suffrage supporters also had to convince American women, many of whom were indifferent to the issue, that suffrage was something they wanted. Apathy among women was an ongoing obstacle that the suffragists had to overcome through organized grassroots efforts. [33] Despite the suffragists’ efforts, no state granted women suffrage between 1896 and 1910, and the NAWSA shifted its focus toward passage of a national constitutional amendment. [32] Suffragists also continued to press for the right to vote in individual states and territories while retaining the goal of federal recognition. Main article: African-American women’s suffrage movement. Suffragist and civil rights activist Mary Church Terrell. Thousands of African-American women were active in the suffrage movement, addressing issues of race, gender, and class, as well as enfranchisement, [34] often through the church but eventually through organizations devoted to specific causes. [35] While white women sought the vote to gain an equal voice in the political process, African-American women often sought the vote as a means of racial uplift and as a way to effect change in the post-Reconstruction era. [36][37] Notable African-American suffragists such as Mary Church Terrell, Sojourner Truth, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Fannie Barrier Williams, and Ida B. Wells-Barnett advocated for suffrage in tandem with civil rights for African-Americans. As early as 1866, in Philadelphia, Margaretta Forten and Harriet Forten Purvis helped to found the Philadelphia Suffrage Association; Purvis would go on to serve on the executive committee of the American Equal Rights Association (AERA), an organization that supported suffrage for women and for African-American men. [38] A national movement in support of suffrage for African-American women began in earnest with the rise of the black women’s club movement. [36] In 1896, club women belonging to various organizations promoting women’s suffrage met in Washington, D. To form the National Association of Colored Women, of which Frances E. Pierre, Harriet Tubman, and Ida B. Wells Barnett were founding members. [39] Led by Mary Church Terrell, it was the largest federation of African-American women’s clubs in the nation. [36] After 1914 it became the National Association of Colored Women’s Clubs. Nannie Helen Burroughs holding a Woman’s National Baptist Convention banner. When the Fifteenth Amendment enfranchised African-American men, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony abandoned the AERA, which supported universal suffrage, to found the National Woman Suffrage Association in 1869, saying black men should not receive the vote before white women. [38] In response, African-American suffragist Frances Ellen Watkins Harper and others joined the American Woman Suffrage Association, which supported suffrage for women and for black men. Mary Ann Shadd Cary, the second African-American woman to receive a degree from Howard University Law School, joined the National Woman Suffrage Association in 1878 when she delivered their convention’s keynote address. [41] Tensions between African-American and white suffragists persisted, even after the NWSA and AWSA merged to form the National American Woman Suffrage Association in 1890. [38] By the early 1900s, white suffragists often adopted strategies designed to appease the Southern states at the expense of African-American women. [42][43] At conventions in 1901 and 1903, in Atlanta and New Orleans, NAWSA prevented African Americans from attending. At the 1911 national NAWSA conference, Martha Gruening asked the organization to formally denounce white supremacy. NAWSA president Anna Howard Shaw refused, saying she was “in favor of colored people voting”, but did not want to alienate others in the suffrage movement. [44] Even NAWSA’s more radical Congressional Committee, which would become the National Woman’s Party, failed African-American women, most visibly by refusing to allow them to march in the nation’s first suffrage parade in Washington, D. While the NAWSA directed Paul not to exclude African-American participants, 72 hours before the parade African-American women were directed to the back of the parade; Ida B. Wells defied these instructions and joined the Illinois unit, prompting telegrams of support. Talbert, a leader in both the NACW and NAACP, and Nannie Helen Burroughs, an educator and activist, contributed to an issue of the Crisis, published by W. Du Bois in August 1915. [44] They wrote passionately about African-American women’s need for the vote. Burroughs, asked what women could do with the ballot, responded pointedly: What can she do without it? Carrie Chapman Catt, President of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, organized the “Winning Plan” that helped secure passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. In 1900, Carrie Chapman Catt succeeded Susan B. Anthony as the president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Catt revitalized NAWSA, turning the focus of the organization to the passage of the federal amendment while simultaneously supporting women who wanted to pressure their states to pass suffrage legislation. The strategy, which she later called “The Winning Plan”, had several goals: women in states that had already granted presidential suffrage (the right to vote for the President) would focus on passing a federal suffrage amendment; women who believed they could influence their state legislatures would focus on amending their state constitutions and Southern states would focus on gaining primary suffrage (the right to vote in state primaries). [45] Simultaneously, the NAWSA worked to elect congressmen who supported suffrage for women. [42] By 1915, NAWSA was a large, powerful organization, with 44 state chapters and more than two million members. In a break with NAWSA, Alice Paul and Lucy Burns founded the Congressional Union for Women Suffrage in 1913 to pressure the federal government to take legislative action. One of their first acts was to organize a women’s suffrage parade in Washington, D. On March 3, 1913, the day before Woodrow Wilson’s inauguration. The procession of more than 5,000 participants, the first of its kind, attracted a crowd of an estimated 500,000, as well as national media attention, but Wilson took no immediate action. In March 1917, the Congressional Union joined with Women’s Party of Western Voters to form the National Woman’s Party (NWP), whose aggressive tactics included staging more radical acts of civil disobedience and controversial demonstrations to draw more attention to the women’s suffrage issue. “Silent sentinels” begin a? 2 1/2-year campaign in front of the White House (1917). When World War I started in 1914, women in eight states had already won the right to vote, but support for a federal amendment was still tepid. The war provided a new urgency to the fight for the vote. Entered World War I, Catt made the controversial decision to support the war effort, despite the widespread pacifist sentiment of many of her colleagues and supporters. [47] As women joined the labor force to replace men serving in the military and took visible positions as nurses, relief workers, and ambulance drivers[48] to support the war effort, NAWSA organizers argued that women’s sacrifices made them deserving of the vote. By contrast, the NWP used the war to point out the contradictions of fighting for democracy abroad while restricting it at home. [42] In 1917, the NWP began picketing the White House to bring attention to the cause of women’s suffrage. In 1914 the constitutional amendment proposed by Sargent, which was nicknamed the Susan B. Anthony Amendment, was once again considered by the Senate, where it was again rejected. [28] In April 1917 the “Anthony Amendment”, which eventually became the Nineteenth Amendment, was reintroduced in the House and Senate. Picketing NWP members, nicknamed the “Silent Sentinels”, continued their protests on the sidewalks outside the White House. On July 4, 1917, police arrested 168 of the protesters, who were sent to prison in Lorton, Virginia. Some of these women, including Lucy Burns and Alice Paul, went on hunger strikes; some were force-fed while others were otherwise harshly treated by prison guards. The release of the women a few months later was largely due to increasing public pressure. Nina Allender political cartoon aimed at President Wilson published in The Suffragist on October 3, 1917. In 1918, President Wilson faced a difficult midterm election and would have to confront the issue of women’s suffrage directly. [42] Fifteen states had extended equal voting rights to women and, by this time, the President fully supported the federal amendment. [49][50] A proposal brought before the House in January 1918 passed by only one vote. The vote was then carried into the Senate where Wilson made an appeal on the Senate floor, an unprecedented action at the time. [51] In a short speech, the President tied women’s right to vote directly to the war, asking, Shall we admit them only to a partnership of suffering and sacrifice and toil and not to a partnership of privilege and right? [42] On September 30, 1918, the proposal fell two votes short of passage, prompting the NWP to direct campaigning against senators who had voted against the amendment. Between January 1918 and June 1919, the House and Senate voted on the federal amendment five times. [42][51][52] Each vote was extremely close and Southern Democrats continued to oppose giving women the vote. [51] Suffragists pressured President Wilson to call a special session of Congress and he agreed to schedule one for May 19, 1919. On May 21, 1919, the amendment passed the House 304 to 89, with 42 votes more than was necessary. [53] On June 4, 1919, it was brought before the Senate and, after Southern Democrats abandoned a filibuster, [42] 37 Republican Senators were joined by 19 Democrats to pass the amendment with 56 ayes and 25 nays. Ultimately, 76% of Republican Senators voted in favor, while 60% of Democrat Senators voted against. “The Big Issue At The Polls” (Judge, 25 Oct 1919). Highest level of women’s suffrage laws just before adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment:[55][56]. Municipal suffrage in some cities. Primary suffrage in some cities. Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul immediately mobilized members of the NAWSA and NWP to pressure states to ratify the amendment. Within a few days, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan did so, their legislatures being in session. By July, Montana, Arkansas, and Nebraska had approved ratification. [53] In other states support proved more difficult to secure. Much of the opposition to the amendment came from Southern Democrats; only one southern state (Texas) and four border states had voted for ratification. [42] Alabama and Georgia were the first states to defeat ratification. The governor of Louisiana worked to organize 13 states to resist ratifying the amendment. The Maryland legislature refused to ratify the amendment and attempted to prevent other states from doing so. Carrie Catt began appealing to Western governors, encouraging them to act swiftly. By the end of 1919, a total of 22 states had ratified the amendment. Anti-suffrage postcard- Suffragists on the warpath. Resistance to ratification took many forms: anti-suffragists continued to say the amendment would never be approved by the November 1920 elections and that special sessions were a waste of time and effort. Other opponents to ratification filed lawsuits requiring the federal amendment to be approved by state referendums. By June 1920, after intense lobbying by both the NAWSA and the NWP, the amendment was ratified by 35 of the necessary 36 state legislatures. [53] Ratification would be determined by Tennessee. In the middle of July 1919, both opponents and supporters of the Anthony Amendment arrived in Nashville to lobby the General Assembly. Carrie Catt, representing the NAWSA, worked with state suffragist leaders, including Anne Dallas Dudley and Abby Crawford Milton. Sue Shelton White, a Tennessee native who had participated in protests at the White House and toured with the Prison Special, represented the NWP. [57] Opposing them were the “Antis”, in particular, Josephine Pearson, state president of the Southern Women’s Rejection League of the Susan. Anthony Amendment, who had served as dean and chair of philosophy at Christian College in Columbia. [43] Pearson was assisted by Anne Pleasant, president of the Louisiana Women’s Rejection League and the wife of a former Louisiana governor. Especially in the South, the question of women’s suffrage was closely tied to issues of race. [58] While both white and black women worked toward women’s suffrage, some white suffragists tried to appease southern states by arguing that votes for women could counter the black vote, strengthening white supremacy. [42] For the anti-suffragists in the south (the “Antis”), the federal amendment was viewed as a “Force Bill”, one that Congress could use to enforce voting provisions not only for women, but for African-American men who were still effectively disenfranchised even after passage of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Carrie Catt warned suffrage leaders in Tennessee that the “Anti-Suffs” would rely on “lies, innuendoes, and near truths”, raising the issue of race as a powerful factor in their arguments. Headquarters of the anti-suffragist National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. Prior to the start of the General Assembly session on August 9, both supporters and opponents had lobbied members of the Tennessee Senate and House of Representatives. Though the Democratic governor of Tennessee, Albert H. Roberts, supported ratification, most lawmakers were still undecided. Anti-suffragists targeted members, meeting their trains as they arrived in Nashville to make their case. When the General Assembly convened on August 9, both supporters and opponents set up stations outside of chambers, handing out yellow roses to suffrage supporters and red roses to the “Antis”. On August 12, the legislature held hearings on the suffrage proposal; the next day the Senate voted 24-5 in favor of ratification. As the House prepared to take up the issue of ratification on August 18, lobbying intensified. [57] House Speaker Seth M. Walker attempted to table the ratification resolution, but was defeated twice with a vote of 48-48. The vote on the resolution would be close. Representative Harry Burn, a Republican, had voted to table the resolution both times. When the vote was held again, Burn voted yes. The 24-year-old said he supported women’s suffrage as a “moral right”, but had voted against it because he believed his constituents opposed it. In the final minutes before the vote, he received a note from his mother, urging him to vote yes. Rumors immediately circulated that Burn and other lawmakers had been bribed, but newspaper reporters found no evidence of this. The same day ratification passed in the General Assembly, Speaker Walker filed a motion to reconsider. When it became clear he did not have enough votes to carry the motion, representatives opposing suffrage boarded a train, fleeing Nashville for Decatur, Alabama to block the House from taking action on the reconsideration motion by preventing a quorum. Thirty-seven legislators fled to Decatur, issuing a statement that ratifying the amendment would violate their oath to defend the state constitution. [57] The ploy failed. Speaker Walker was unable to muster any additional votes in the allotted time. When the House reconvened to take the final procedural steps that would reaffirm ratification, Tennessee suffragists seized an opportunity to taunt the missing Anti delegates by sitting at their empty desks. When ratification was finally confirmed, a suffragist on the floor of the House rang a miniature Liberty Bell. On August 18, 1920, Tennessee narrowly approved the Nineteenth Amendment, with 50 of 99 members of the Tennessee House of Representatives voting yes. [49][59] This provided the final ratification necessary to add the amendment to the Constitution, [60] making the United States the twenty-seventh country in the world to give women the right to vote. Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby, whose office received it at 4:00 a. On August 26, 1920. Once certified as correct, Colby signed the Proclamation of the Women’s Suffrage Amendment to the U. Constitution in the presence of his secretary only. Though accusations of bribery did not cause the Tennessee legislature to reconsider its ratification of the suffrage amendment, Alice Paul immediately cautioned that “women are not yet fully free” and that women can expect nothing from the politicians… Until they stand as a unit in a party of their own”, saying that discrimination still exists “on the statute books which will not be removed by the ratification. [62] Paul charged that the amendment passed only because “it at last became more expedient for those in control of the Government to aid suffrage than to oppose it”. Sewing stars on a suffrage flag. Congress proposed the Nineteenth Amendment on June 4, 1919, and the following states ratified the amendment. Illinois (June 10, 1919)[65][66][note 4]. Wisconsin (June 10, 1919)[65][66]. Michigan (June 10, 1919)[68]. Kansas (June 16, 1919)[69]. Ohio (June 16, 1919)[70][71][72]. New York (June 16, 1919)[73]. Pennsylvania (June 24, 1919)[72]. Massachusetts (June 25, 1919)[72]. Texas (June 28, 1919)[72]. Iowa (July 2, 1919)[note 5]. Missouri (July 3, 1919). Arkansas (July 28, 1919)[74]. Montana (July 30, 1919)[74] (August 2, 1919);[note 5][note 6]. Nebraska (August 2, 1919)[74]. Minnesota (September 8, 1919). New Hampshire (September 10, 1919)[note 5]. Utah (September 30, 1919)[75]. California (November 1, 1919)[74]. Maine (November 5, 1919)[76]. North Dakota (December 1, 1919)[74]. South Dakota (December 4, 1919)[76]. Colorado (December 12, 1919)[74] (December 15, 1919)[note 5]. Kentucky (January 6, 1920)[74]. Rhode Island (January 6, 1920)[74]. Oregon (January 12, 1920)[76]. Indiana (January 16, 1920)[77][78]. Wyoming (January 26, 1920)[79][note 7]. Nevada (February 7, 1920)[74]. New Jersey (February 9, 1920)[79][note 8]. Idaho (February 11, 1920)[79]. Arizona (February 12, 1920)[79]. New Mexico (February 16, 1920)[79][note 9]. Oklahoma (February 23, 1920)[80][note 10]. West Virginia (March 10, 1920, confirmed on September 21, 1920)[note 11]. Washington (March 22, 1920)[note 12]. Tennessee (August 18, 1920)[83][note 13][84]. The ratification process required 36 states, and completed with the approval by Tennessee. Though not necessary for adoption, the following states subsequently ratified the amendment. Some states did not call a legislative session to hold a vote until later, others rejected it when it was proposed and then reversed their decisions years later, with the last taking place in 1984. Connecticut (September 14, 1920, reaffirmed on September 21, 1920). Vermont (February 8, 1921). Delaware (March 6, 1923, after being rejected on June 2, 1920). Maryland (March 29, 1941, after being rejected on February 24, 1920; not certified until February 25, 1958). Virginia (February 21, 1952, after being rejected on February 12, 1920). Alabama (September 8, 1953, after being rejected on September 22, 1919). Florida (May 13, 1969)[86]. South Carolina (July 1, 1969, after being rejected on January 28, 1920; not certified until August 22, 1973). Georgia (February 20, 1970, after being rejected on July 24, 1919). Louisiana (June 11, 1970, after being rejected on July 1, 1920). North Carolina (May 6, 1971). Mississippi (March 22, 1984, after being rejected on March 29, 1920). With Mississippi’s ratification in 1984, the amendment was now ratified by all states having existed at the time of its adoption in 1920. 19th Amendment Voting Badge-Harding Coolidge Ticket 1920. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the amendment’s validity in Leser v. [87][88] Maryland citizens Mary D. Randolph, “‘a colored female citizen’ of 331 West Biddle Street”, [89] and Cecilia Street Waters, “a white woman, of 824 North Eutaw Street”, [89] applied for and were granted registration as qualified Baltimore voters on October 12, 1920. To have their names removed from the list of qualified voters, Oscar Leser and others brought suit against the two women on the sole grounds that they were women, arguing that they were not eligible to vote because the Constitution of Maryland limited suffrage to men[90] and the Maryland legislature had refused to vote to ratify the Nineteenth Amendment. Two months before, on August 26, 1920, the federal government had proclaimed the amendment incorporated into the Constitution. Leser said the amendment “destroyed State autonomy” because it increased Maryland’s electorate without the state’s consent. The Supreme Court answered that the Nineteenth Amendment had similar wording to the Fifteenth Amendment, which had expanded state electorates without regard to race for more than fifty years by that time despite rejection by six states (including Maryland). [88][91] Leser further argued that the state constitutions in some ratifying states did not allow their legislatures to ratify. The Court replied that state ratification was a federal function granted under Article V of the U. Constitution and not subject to a state constitution’s limitations. Finally, those bringing suit asserted the Nineteenth Amendment was not adopted because Tennessee and West Virginia violated their own rules of procedure. The Court ruled that the point was moot because Connecticut and Vermont had subsequently ratified the amendment, providing a sufficient number of state ratifications to adopt the Nineteenth Amendment even without Tennessee and West Virginia. The Court also ruled that Tennessee’s and West Virginia’s certifications of their state ratifications was binding and had been duly authenticated by their respective Secretaries of State. [92] As a result of the Court’s ruling, Randolph and Waters were permitted to become registered voters in Baltimore. Another challenge to the Nineteenth Amendment’s adoption was dismissed by the Supreme Court in Fairchild v. Hughes, [93][94] because the party bringing the suit, Charles S. Fairchild, came from a state that already allowed women to vote and so Fairchild lacked standing. A Ladies Home Journal ad targeted female votes for 1920 presidential election. Ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment enfranchised 26 million American women in time for the 1920 U. [95] Many legislators feared that a powerful women’s bloc would emerge in American politics. This fear led to the passage of such laws as the Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Protection Act of 1921, which expanded maternity care during the 1920s. [96] Newly enfranchised women and women’s groups prioritized a reform agenda rather than party loyalty and their first goal was the Sheppard-Towner Act. It was the first federal social security law and made a dramatic difference before it was allowed to lapse in 1929. [97] Other efforts at the federal level in the early 1920s that related to women labor and women’s citizenship rights included the establishment of a Women’s Bureau in the U. Department of Labor in 1920 and passage of the Cable Act in 1922. [98] After the U. Presidential election in 1924, politicians realized the women’s bloc they had feared did not actually exist and they did not need to cater to what they considered as “women’s issues” after all. [99] The eventual appearance of an American women’s voting bloc has been tracked to various dates, depending on the source, from the 1950s[100] to 1970. [101] Around 1980, a nationwide gender gap in voting had emerged, with women usually favoring the Democratic candidate in presidential elections. According to political scientists J. Kevin Corder and Christina Wolbrecht, few women turned out to vote in the first national elections after the Nineteenth Amendment gave them the right to do so. In 1920, 36 percent of eligible women turned out to vote (compared with 68 percent of men). Inexperience with voting and persistent beliefs that voting was inappropriate for women may also have kept turnout low. The participation gap was lowest between men and women in swing states at the time, in states that had closer races such as Missouri and Kentucky, and where barriers to voting were lower. [103][104] By 1960, women were turning out to vote in presidential elections in greater numbers than men and a trend of higher female voting engagement has continued into 2018. African-Americans had gained the right to vote, but for 75 percent of them it was granted in name only, as state constitutional loopholes kept them from exercising that right. [36] Prior to the passage of the amendment, southern politicians held firm in their convictions not to allow African-American women to vote. [106] They had to fight to secure not only their own right to vote, but the right of African-American men as well. Three million women south of the Mason-Dixon line remained disfranchised after the passage of the amendment. [106][108] Election officials regularly obstructed access to the ballot box. [110] In 1926, a group of women attempting to register in Birmingham, Alabama were beaten by officials. [111] Incidents such as this, threats of violence and job losses, and legalized prejudicial practices blocked women of color from voting. African-Americans continued to face barriers preventing them from exercising their vote until a new movement arose in the 1950s and 1960s, which posited voting rights as civil rights. [106][111] Nearly a thousand civil rights workers converged on the South to support voting rights as part of Freedom Summer. However, state officials continued to refuse registration until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibited racial discrimination in voting. [109][112] For the first time, states were forbidden from imposing discriminatory restrictions on voting eligibility, and mechanisms were placed allowing the federal government to enforce its provisions. Native Americans were granted citizenship by an Act of Congress in 1924, [113] but state policies prohibited them from voting. In 1948, a suit brought by World War II veteran Miguel Trujillo resulted in Native Americans gaining the right to vote in New Mexico and Arizona, [114] but some states continued to bar them from voting until 1957. [115] Further, the 1975 extensions of the Voting Rights Act included requiring bilingual ballots and voting materials in certain regions, making it easier for Latina women to vote. National immigration laws prevented Asians from gaining citizenship until 1952. After passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, women still faced political limitations. Women had to lobby their state legislators, bring lawsuits, and engage in letter-writing campaigns to earn the right to sit on juries. In California, women won the right to serve on juries four years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. In Colorado, it took 33 years. Women continue to face obstacles when running for elective offices, and the Equal Rights Amendment, which would grant women equal rights under the law, has yet to be realized. [116][117][118][119]. In 1920, about six months before the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified, Emma Smith DeVoe and Carrie Chapman Catt agreed to merge the National American Woman Suffrage Association and the National Council of Women Voters to help newly enfranchised women exercise their responsibilities as voters. Originally only women could join the league, but in 1973 the charter was modified to include men. Today, the League of Women Voters operates at the local, state, and national level, with over 1,000 local and 50 state leagues, and one territory league in the U. Some critics and historians question whether creating an organization dedicated to political education rather than political action made sense in the first few years after ratification, suggesting that the League of Women Voters diverted the energy of activists. Main article: Equal Rights Amendment. Alice Paul and the NWP did not believe the Nineteenth Amendment would be enough to ensure men and women were treated equally, and in 1921 the NWP announced plans to campaign for another amendment which would guarantee equal rights not limited to voting. The first draft of the Equal Rights Amendment, written by Paul and Crystal Eastman and first named “the Lucretia Mott Amendment”, stated: No political, civil, or legal disabilities or inequalities on account of sex or on account of marriage, unless applying equally to both sexes, shall exist within the United States or any territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [120] Senator Charles Curtis brought it to Congress that year, but it did not make it to the floor for a vote. It was introduced in every congressional session from 1921 to 1971, usually not making it out of committee. The amendment did not have the full support of women’s rights activists, and was opposed by Carrie Catt and the League of Women Voters. Whereas the NWP believed in total equality, even if that meant sacrificing benefits given to women through protective legislation, some groups like the Women’s Joint Congressional Committee and the Women’s Bureau believed the loss of benefits relating to safety regulations, working conditions, lunch breaks, maternity provisions, and other labor protections would outweigh what would be gained. Labor leaders like Alice Hamilton and Mary Anderson argued that it would set their efforts back and make sacrifices of what progress they had made. [122][123] In response to these concerns, a provision known as “the Hayden rider” was added to the ERA to retain special labor protections for women, and passed the Senate in 1950 and 1953, but failed in the House. In 1958, President Eisenhower called on Congress to pass the amendment, but the Hayden rider was controversial, meeting with opposition from the NWP and others who felt it undermined its original purpose. The growing, productive women’s movements of the 1960s and 1970s renewed support for the amendment. Representative Martha Griffiths of Michigan reintroduced it in 1971, leading to its approval by the House of Representatives that year. After it passed in the Senate on March 22, 1972, it went to state legislatures for ratification. Congress originally set a deadline of March 22, 1979, by which point at least 38 states needed to ratify the amendment. It reached 35 by 1977, with broad bipartisan support including both major political parties and Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter. However, when Phyllis Schlafly mobilized conservative women in opposition, four states rescinded their ratification, although whether a state may do so is disputed. [126] The amendment did not reach the necessary 38 states by the deadline. [43] President Carter signed a controversial extension of the deadline to 1982, but that time saw no additional ratifications. In the 1990s, ERA supporters resumed efforts for ratification, arguing that the pre-deadline ratifications still applied, that the deadline itself can be lifted, and that only three states were needed. Whether the amendment is still before the states for ratification remains disputed, but in 2014 both Virginia and Illinois state senates voted to ratify, although both were blocked in the house chambers. In 2017, 45 years after the amendment was originally submitted to states, the Nevada legislature became the first to ratify it following expiration of the deadlines. Illinois lawmakers followed in 2018. [126] Another attempt in Virginia passed the Assembly but was defeated on the state senate floor by one vote. [127] The most recent effort to remove the deadline was in early 2019, with proposed legislation from Jackie Speier, accumulating 188 co-sponsors and pending in Congress as of August 2019. File:Portrait Monument Video 01. “The Portrait Monument” (originally “Woman’s Movement”) by sculptress Adelaide Johnson, in the Capitol rotunda. 7 1/2-ton marble slab from a Carrara, Italy, quarry carved into statue called the “Portrait Monument”[129] (originally known as the “Woman’s Movement”)[130] by sculptress Adelaide Johnson was unveiled at the Capitol rotunda on February 15, 1921, six months after the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, on the 101st anniversary of Susan B. Anthony’s birth, and during the National Woman’s Party’s first post-ratification national convention in Washington, D. [129] The Party presented it as a gift from the women of the U. The monument is installed in the Capitol rotunda and features busts of Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott. More than fifty women’s groups with delegates from every state were represented at the dedication ceremony in 1921 that was presided over by Jane Addams. After the ceremony, the statue was moved temporarily to the Capitol crypt, where it stood for less than a month until Johnson discovered that an inscription stenciled in gold lettering on the back of the monument had been removed. The inscription read, in part: Woman, first denied a soul, then called mindless, now arisen declares herself an entity to be reckoned. Spiritually, the woman movement… Represents the emancipation of womanhood. The release of the feminine principal in humanity, the moral integration of human evolution come to rescue torn and struggling humanity from its savage self. [129] Congress denied passage of several bills to move the statue, whose place in the crypt also held brooms and mops. In 1963, the crypt was cleaned for an exhibition of several statues including this one, which had been dubbed “The Women in the Bathtub”. On August 26, 2016, a monument commemorating Tennessee’s role in providing the required 36th state ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment was unveiled in Centennial Park (Nashville) in Nashville, Tennessee. [132] The memorial, erected by the Tennessee Suffrage Monument, Inc. [133] and created by Alan LeQuire, features likenesses of suffragists who were particularly involved in securing Tennessee’s ratification: Carrie Chapman Catt; Anne Dallas Dudley; Abby Crawford Milton; Juno Frankie Pierce; and Sue Shelton White. [43][134] In June 2018, the city of Knoxville, Tennessee, unveiled another sculpture by LeQuire, this one depicting 24-year-old freshman state representative Harry T. Burn and his mother. Representative Burn, at the urging of his mother, cast the deciding vote on August 18, 1920, making Tennessee the final state needed for the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. In 2018, Utah launched a campaign called Better Days 2020 to “popularize Utah women’s history”. One of its first projects was the unveiling on the Salt Lake City capitol steps of the design for a license plate in recognition of women’s suffrage. The commemorative license plate would be available for new or existing car registrations in the state. The year 2020 marks the centennial of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, as well as the 150th anniversary of the first women voting in Utah, which was the first state in the nation where women cast a ballot. An annual celebration of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, known as Women’s Equality Day, began on August 26, 1973. [137] There usually is heightened attention and news media coverage during momentous anniversaries such as the 75th (1995) and 100th (2020), as well as in 2016 because of the presidential election. [138] For the amendment’s centennial, several organizations announced large events or exhibits, including the National Constitution Center and National Archives and Records Administration. See also: Women’s suffrage in film. Lucy Burns (left, while in jail) and Alice Paul (right) of the Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage were subjects of the film Iron Jawed Angels. The Nineteenth Amendment has been featured in a number of songs, films, and television programs. The 1976 song “Sufferin’ Till Suffrage” from Schoolhouse Rock! Performed by Essra Mohawk and written by Bob Dorough and Tom Yohe, states, in part, Not a woman here could vote, no matter what age, Then the Nineteenth Amendment struck down that restrictive rule… Yes the Nineteenth Amendment Struck down that restrictive rule. [140][141] In 2018, various recording artists released an album called 27: The Most Perfect Album, featuring songs inspired by the 27 amendments to the U. Constitution; Dolly Parton’s song inspired by the Nineteenth Amendment is called “A Woman’s Right”. One Woman, One Vote is a 1995 PBS documentary narrated by actor Susan Sarandon chronicling the Seneca Falls Convention through the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. [144][145] Another documentary was released in 1999 by filmmaker Ken Burns, Not For Ourselves Alone: The Story of Elizabeth Cady Stanton & Susan B. It used archival footage and commentary by actors Ann Dowd, Julie Harris, Sally Kellerman and Amy Madigan. The 2004 drama Iron Jawed Angels depicting suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, played by actors Hilary Swank and Frances O’Connor, respectively, as they help secure the Nineteenth Amendment. [150][151] In August 2018, former U. This item is in the category “Collectibles\Photographic Images\Photographs”. The seller is “memorabilia111″ and is located in this country: US. This item can be shipped to United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Denmark, Romania, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Estonia, Australia, Greece, Portugal, Cyprus, Slovenia, Japan, China, Sweden, Korea, South, Indonesia, Taiwan, South Africa, Thailand, Belgium, France, Hong Kong, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Italy, Germany, Austria, Bahamas, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Croatia, Republic of, Malaysia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Kitts-Nevis, Saint Lucia, Montserrat, Turks and Caicos Islands, Barbados, Bangladesh, Bermuda, Brunei Darussalam, Bolivia, Ecuador, Egypt, French Guiana, Guernsey, Gibraltar, Guadeloupe, Iceland, Jersey, Jordan, Cambodia, Cayman Islands, Liechtenstein, Sri Lanka, Luxembourg, Monaco, Macau, Martinique, Maldives, Nicaragua, Oman, Peru, Pakistan, Paraguay, Reunion, Vietnam, Uruguay.
  • Date of Creation: 1920-1929
  • Type: Photograph

1920 Original Cherokee Delegate Fite Photo Vintage San Francisco Womens Rights